← Home
Civic Life Investment Portfolio
The United States scores 45 on Civic Life. This is our most neglected binding constraint.
The informal fabric of self-government — trust, shared information, civic association, local journalism, physical community spaces — has hollowed out. We cannot sustain universal programs, free elections, or democratic governance on a foundation this weak.
Trust in institutions
US 43%
Denmark 74% / Finland 78%
News deserts
200 counties with zero local newspaper
1,500 more effectively deserts
Civic association
~50% decline
since 1975
The Response
Four Civic-Life Investments
Each investment targets a measurable dimension of civic infrastructure. Click to expand.
Projected Impact
From Investment to Score Movement
| Indicator | Current | Target | Investments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust in institutions | 43% | 60% | Postal, Public Media, Journalism |
| Shared factual baseline | Fragmented | Restored | Public Media, Journalism |
| Civic association density | Declining | Rebuilding | Postal, Civic Corps |
| Local information access | ~1,700 deserts | <300 deserts | Journalism, Civic Corps |
| Digital participation access | Rural/urban gaps | Universal | Postal |
| Deliberative capacity | Low | Growing | Public Media, Postal |
| Youth civic engagement | Low | 100K+/yr | Civic Corps |
What This Is Not
✗Not a direct government broadcaster
✗Not content regulation of private media
✗Not prescription of editorial viewpoints
✗Not compelled civic participation
The investments are infrastructure. Citizens build civic life on that infrastructure through their own choices.
Budget Context
Total Investment
~$50-60Bannually
Approximately 4% of the Accord's ~$1.35T structural surplus. This is the investment scale the evidence suggests is necessary to move a domain score meaningfully. Smaller investments have been tried and failed.
$53Bof $1,350B surplus
Civic Life: ~4%Total structural surplus