The Managed Reallocation

A Transition Framework for the New American Accord: The Air-Pocket from Autumn 2028 to Summer 2029, and How to Cross It

Position paper — for candidate, advisor, and donor circulation, and as a roadmap for the Federal Reserve. Draft for review.

1. Thesis

The New American Accord moves the country's stored value out of financial claims—equities priced near thirty times forward earnings, trophy real estate, tax-advantaged stores of value—and into productive public capital and broad-based purchasing power. Paper wealth contracts; the floor under households rises. The long-run case is sound: an economy in which accumulated wealth outgrows the output that sustains it, and in which the returns concentrate at the top, runs a chronic demand deficiency that monetary policy alone cannot cure (Piketty 2014; Summers 2014; Mian, Straub & Sufi 2021a). The Accord's beneficiary-pays architecture corrects that deficiency at the structural level.

The central problem is timing, and the corrected calendar makes it sharper than any single-day framing suggests. The repricing front-runs the policy: it begins as enactment becomes likely in the autumn of 2028 and largely completes on the election. The relief travels at the speed of Congress: household cash requires an appropriation, so the checks begin only after the reconciliation bill is enacted—realistically in the spring or summer of 2029. Between those two events sits a gap of roughly three to four quarters in which the contraction has landed and the cash has not. Crossing that air-pocket is the whole task of the transition.

In that window the Accord works with the institutions that already exist. The Federal Reserve carries the macroeconomic load. The President deploys the executive authorities he holds without Congress—chiefly opening Veterans Health Administration capacity to civilians and standing up the delivery rails so the checks flow the moment they are funded. Treasury and the IRS prepare to disburse. The plan accepts a deliberate deficit for a year or two; the bridge overspend is the design. This document traces the months from August 2028 to summer 2029, sets out what each instrument does and when, and—because the Fed is the macro backstop in the gap—reads the repricing the way the central bank should.

2. The Repricing Already Happened: A Path from August 2028

An asset price is the present value of expected after-tax cash flows. A credible, permanent change in the taxation of inheritance and high compensation is capitalized into prices the moment the regime becomes expected, because forward-looking markets discount the entire future stream at once (Auerbach 1979). The adjustment therefore arrives early and concentrates over a handful of months.

August–October 2028. If enactment looks like a settled outcome after the conventions, anticipatory repricing begins, and the Federal Reserve gets its first chances to respond at its September and early-November meetings. The surface being repriced is at record extension: household net worth near $181.6 trillion against GDP near $30 trillion—a wealth-to-income ratio close to six (Federal Reserve Z.1; Piketty & Zucman 2014)—with the Buffett Indicator between roughly 220% and 238%, the highest on record and more than two standard deviations above trend (Buffett-indicator trackers, 2026), concentrated in corporate equities at the top. Capital begins rotating into Treasuries, bidding yields down, and abroad, softening the dollar.

November 2028. The election settles enactment from a probability into a near-certainty, and the market completes the bulk of its repricing. The scale is easy to overstate. The move decomposes into a one-time cut to after-tax corporate earnings (corporate restoration, book minimum, buyback excise, compensation levy—plausibly 8–15%) and a compression of the multiple, and the multiple channel is smaller than a mechanical thirty-to-twenty suggests: roughly two-thirds of U.S. equity sits in tax-exempt or tax-deferred hands that do not capitalize the higher capital-income tax, while the bond rotation drives the risk-free rate down and supports the multiple in the other direction. The orderly path is therefore an initial index decline on the order of 10–15%, front-loaded across the autumn, with a disorderly path reaching further. And because the comparison that matters is thirty times today's earnings against roughly twenty times the higher earnings of a more heavily invested economy a few years out, much of the drop is a time correction rather than a permanent loss—prices grind while earnings grow into the compressed multiple and largely restore the level within a few years.

The aggregate, though, hides the real event, which is a violent rotation rather than a uniform derating. Fossil and carbon-intensive names, high-frequency and speculative finance, asset-management and brokerage fees, tax-preparation and payroll processing, private health insurance, luxury, and the most extended growth names face deep and partly permanent impairment—thirty to sixty percent or more—while consumer staples, the electrification supply chain, healthcare delivery, construction and the trades, domestic manufacturing, and regulated utilities hold or rise. The index nets the losers against the winners, which is why the headline move is moderate while specific sectors crash. The most mobile fortunes begin relocating movable capital, though, as Section 8 shows, that does not escape the repricing itself.

December 2028. Holders position against rules they can now see coming: estate-exposed families pursue prepayment and pre-parity gifting, and year-end realizations run ahead of basis-step-up repeal and realization-at-death. The bond bid and the softer dollar persist; the repricing settles rather than reverses.

January 2029. Inauguration on the 20th. The Day-One executive orders stand up the machinery: the Treasury/IRS deposit rail for benefits, standardized compensation reporting, the COMPASS beta, the federal-land and procurement inventories. The President opens Veterans Health Administration excess capacity to civilians and expands VA telehealth and rural clinics—real care delivered under authority he already holds. The new taxes are retroactive to January, so liabilities begin accruing before the statute exists. The Fed, by its late-January meeting, has had at least its third opportunity to act on a repricing it has watched since the autumn. No household check has yet been sent, because Congress has not yet appropriated one.

Spring–summer 2029. The reconciliation bill is enacted, and household cash begins. The first checks reach families in the summer—roughly three to four quarters after the repricing began.

Retirement accounts reprice, and the Accord builds the floor that holds underneath them. A broadly diversified account weathers the repricing far better than the sector headlines imply, because it holds the winners alongside the losers and rides the earnings recovery; the lasting damage falls on concentrated or sector-tilted accounts—those heavy in fossil, speculative finance, or the most extended growth names. Either way the premise that "equities always go up" is the unexamined assumption beneath the entire defined-contribution experiment, and it is questionable. The structural fact the repricing exposes is the decades-long shift from defined-benefit pensions, which pay a fixed income regardless of market level, to defined-contribution accounts, which place market risk on the individual saver. The Accord answers that exposure by guaranteeing retirement security through instruments that do not move with the market: Social Security 2.0 pays a General-Fund-financed Dignity Floor—a defined monthly benefit; Distributed Healthcare covers medical and long-term-care cost; the Universal Child Allowance and Pre-bate sustain household consumption. A retiree's security rests on these guarantees rather than on the market's level in the year he happens to retire. Markets have fallen amid exuberance and recovered before; the floor is what carries people through the trough. And the derating is a one-time level shift: once the permanent regime is fully priced, markets settle and grow from a lower base, and as the public investment lifts long-run output, earnings rise into the lower multiple over the following decade.

3. The Self-Stabilizing Financial Dynamics—and Their Sharp Edge

The capital that exits derating equities and trophy assets rotates, producing two cushions and one complication the Fed should understand in advance.

Rotation into bonds depresses interest rates. Wealth fleeing newly-taxed, newly-derated equities seeks the deepest safe market on earth—Treasuries—and bidding up bonds drives yields down. This cushions the real economy and, because the Accord raises revenue, reduces issuance and eases debt service. The bond rally and the equity derating are largely two sides of one rebalancing.

Rotation abroad depreciates the dollar. Capital exiting to foreign assets must convert out of dollars, pressing the exchange rate down. Under high capital mobility, a domestic shift that lowers the relative after-tax return on U.S. assets weakens the currency (Mundell 1963).

A weaker dollar cuts both ways. It helps exporters—U.S. goods become cheaper abroad—though on a lag, because the trade balance typically worsens before it improves as contracts roll and quantities adjust (the J-curve; Rose & Yellen 1989). It also raises import prices: Chinese goods are cheap in American stores today partly because the dollar is strong against a managed yuan, and a depreciating dollar reverses that. Since the imported basket—appliances above all, and a share of groceries—overlaps with what the cash payment funds, the relief on imported staples is partly eroded. Size the cash to purchasing power, not to nominal dollars.

4. The Core Risk: The Air-Pocket

The dominant risk is neither the repricing itself nor the composition of demand. It is the gap between a contraction that lands in late 2028 and a cash relief that cannot arrive until Congress acts in mid-2029.

For three to four quarters, the economy absorbs the full wealth-and-asset shock with no fiscal cash offset. In a depressed economy, demand shortfalls can damage long-run capacity through hysteresis, so a deep trough is not merely cyclical (DeLong & Summers 2012). The encouraging corollary is that fiscal multipliers are largest precisely when slack is largest (Auerbach & Gorodnichenko 2012; Ramey 2019): the cash, when it lands in the summer, does unusually heavy work, which is the argument for sizing it generously and getting Congress to move quickly. The single most valuable thing the framework can do is shorten the gap—every month the reconciliation bill is accelerated is a month less of unbuffered contraction.

A note on the demand composition, which is a second-order matter rather than the core risk. Demand is redirected through two channels, both productive. The cash, when it arrives, lands on staples—groceries, diapers, appliances (Parker, Souleles, Johnson & McClelland 2013; Dynan, Skinner & Zeldes 2004)—while the contraction fell on luxury, discretionary, and asset-linked spending: the intended reallocation, sustaining the essential economy as the discretionary one contracts. The carbon fee opens the second channel. Though fully rebated in the early years, its credible escalating path pulls household investment forward into electrification and efficiency—EVs, rooftop solar, heat-pump retrofits, home insulation, window treatments, home battery storage, and the work-from-home communication upgrades that cut commuting—much as the credible tax regime pulled the asset repricing forward. That spending flows to installers, the trades, and domestic manufacturing, absorbing reallocated labor exactly where the Accord wants the economy to grow. Two honest caveats attach. These are big-ticket items, so liquidity-constrained households need financing or credits to take part; the fee falls on everyone, but the ability to invest out of it runs up the income scale. And much of the hardware—panels, batteries, EVs—is import-heavy, so the weaker dollar raises its price, the same erosion that touches imported staples and the same dependence on Chinese supply. The residual price caution—cash- and electrification-driven demand meeting inelastic short-run supply—is a question for the VAT phase-in once it matures, not for the air-pocket.

A real early demand also appears in care—telehealth, mobile clinics, dental, mental health—against a supply-constrained sector. The rollout assigns a dental appointment lottery by acuity for the first twelve months, with non-urgent waits of four to eight weeks under active management; the bottleneck there is providers, not money, which is why opening VHA capacity early matters.

5. The Crux: What Leads, What Holds, What Lags

LEAD — the early levers are the ones that do not need Congress, plus the cash as soon as it does. Household cash is the decisive stabilizer, but it begins only after the reconciliation bill is enacted, with the first checks in the summer of 2029. Until then the President's deployable authority is limited but real: opening VHA excess capacity to civilians and expanding VA telehealth and rural clinics to deliver early care; standing up the Treasury/IRS deposit rail so the checks flow within thirty days of funding; and using existing land, procurement, and hiring authorities. The carbon fee, beginning at $80/ton and escalating $30/year, is fully rebated to households in the early years, so it is roughly neutral on net and its rebate is simply delivered alongside it. The macroeconomic stabilizer in the gap is the Federal Reserve.

HOLD — once the cash flows, keep it flat; let the VAT phase in slowly. The payment does not shrink; withdrawing support during a fragile recovery is the classic pro-cyclical error. The VAT enters in small annual steps from a low base, so in Years One and Two it is modest and raises little—it neither funds much nor restrains much yet. Its role as a price-restraint that withdraws excess purchasing power matures only later, as the steps accumulate and as households can bear them. Top-end taxes apply retroactively, and the Estate Tax Prepayment Plan converts what would be lumpy, fire-sale-inducing liquidations into scheduled installments credited dollar-for-dollar at transfer, keeping the unwind orderly.

LAG — Year Two and beyond. Full Distributed Healthcare arrives through its capacity-gated waves (Wave 0 first—the uninsured, Medicaid, federal, and VA populations—then ACA and small employers, then larger employers, then Medicare). Infrastructure follows as the LDD Corps procures, permits, and builds. Labor migrates out of extractive and rent-seeking work into productive commerce and public service over the multi-year window the carbon-fee escalation finances. The expert boards reach authority and take up the governing roles the Fed and Treasury carry alone at the start.

The rule: lean on the Fed and the President's care and readiness authorities through the gap, shorten the gap as much as possible, deliver the cash the moment it is funded and then hold it, let the VAT phase in slowly, and let the large programs and the mature apparatus arrive later—accepting the bridge deficit throughout.

6. Who Handles the Turbulence

The turbulence runs from roughly August 2028, when the repricing begins, to the summer of 2029, when the cash arrives. Through that window the work falls to the institutions already in place.

The Federal Reserve is the macroeconomic stabilizer. It is the only actor able to support demand across the cash-less gap, and it has had since the autumn to position. Its task is to distinguish fundamental repricing—the intended, healthy derating of an over-valued market, which it should support the economy through without flooding liquidity to re-inflate prices—from disorderly deleveraging—margin cascades, fire sales, funding-market seizure—which it backstops as lender of last resort, as in 2008 and 2020. This paper is, in part, the map that lets the Fed tell one from the other.

The President delivers early care and builds the rails. Opening VHA excess capacity to civilians—consistent with the VA's existing emergency authority—and expanding VA telehealth and rural clinics puts real care in place in the first months. The Day-One orders make the Treasury/IRS deposit rail ready so that household cash moves within thirty days of the appropriation.

Treasury and the IRS prepare the disbursement. They delivered broad household payments in 2008 and 2020 and can do so again the moment Congress funds the checks.

The IRS rebuilds for the enforcement that comes later. The service is the workhorse of the revenue architecture, and it begins the transition with its capacity degraded over 2025–2028. Early hiring captures skilled people leaving high-frequency trading, 401(k) administration, retail tax preparation, and payroll processing; because new agents train before they collect, the enforcement payoff—audits, penalties, recovered liabilities—arrives later, as the rebuilt service comes up to strength.

The boards ramp into their roles. The American Healthcare Quality Board begins reference pricing and cost discipline; the National Statistics Board runs the COMPASS beta. Small staffs with large authority, they grow into the governing functions they will own.

7. Preplanning Stabilizers

Three features, built before the shock, do real work. The Estate Tax Prepayment Plan, with installment and disclosure-during-life options, converts lumpy estate liquidations into scheduled streams, holding the top-end unwind orderly. The Day-One readiness rails ensure household cash moves within thirty days of the appropriation, so none of the gap is wasted on plumbing once Congress acts. And the retirement floor—the Dignity Floor, Distributed Healthcare, and the UCA and Pre-bate—gives households security that holds independent of the market, in place before retirees need it.

8. Honest Risk Register

The air-pocket depth. The main risk, addressed by shortening the gap (fast reconciliation), by the Fed across the window, and by the President's early-care and readiness authorities. The longer the gap, the deeper the trough.

Leakage and flight. The one-time repricing of the assets themselves cannot be outrun: a U.S.-equity-heavy portfolio reprices wherever its owner lives, so the prominent fortunes that relocate take the loss with them. What partially relocates is forward exposure—the most mobile holders shift movable capital and future income to lower-tax domiciles—and even that is bounded by the exit tax on renunciation, by immovable U.S. real estate and U.S.-sourced income that stay in the net, and by sales-factor apportionment and the Hidden Asset Recovery Office. The empirical record on wealth-tax behavioral response is mixed and should be modeled, not assumed away: meaningful elasticities where avoidance is easy (Brülhart, Gruber, Krapf & Schmidheiny 2022; France's former wealth tax as a cautionary case) versus more moderate responses under strong enforcement and broad bases (Jakobsen, Jakobsen, Kleven & Zucman 2020; Saez & Zucman 2019). Leakage is real on the forward flow of the most mobile fortunes and minimal on the stock repricing, which no one escapes.

Retirement repricing. Accounts will fall; the Accord carries retirees on the market-independent floor described in Section 2.

Staples inflation. A later-phase concern once cash flows: demand for groceries, diapers, and appliances meeting inelastic short-run supply, and pricier imports from a weaker dollar, can lift staple prices. The maturing VAT phase-in is the instrument that withdraws the excess; size the cash to purchasing power in the meantime.

The dollar's double edge. The export benefit lags (J-curve) while the import-cost rise lands sooner on the goods high-MPC households buy—a medium-term tailwind, not an early backstop.

Reallocation friction. Labor moves from extractive and rent-seeking work—high-frequency trading, 401(k) administration, retail tax preparation, payroll processing—into healthcare delivery, housing manufacture and grid buildout, childcare and education, restored federal capacity, and public service. Early absorption runs through direct government hiring, the IRS first; the carbon-fee escalation finances the slower migration. The geographic and skill mismatch is where transitional unemployment concentrates.

9. Conclusion

The Accord's transition converts a low-velocity stock of financial claims into a high-velocity flow of essential consumption and public investment. The long-run macroeconomics favor it, and the financial-market dynamics partly stabilize it on their own—capital fleeing derated equities lowers rates and weakens the dollar. But the repricing arrives in the autumn of 2028 and the cash cannot arrive until Congress acts in mid-2029, and the first one to two years must be run with the tools already in hand:

1. Shorten the gap and cover it. Move the reconciliation bill as fast as the votes allow; across the cash-less months, lean on the Federal Reserve for demand and on the President's authorities—VHA capacity for civilians, VA telehealth and rural clinics, and the Day-One delivery rails—for care and readiness.
2. Deliver the cash the moment it is funded, then hold it. Size the summer-2029 payment to purchasing power, keep it flat through the recovery, and let the VAT phase in slowly from a low base; smooth top-end collection through estate prepayment.
3. Let the large programs, the IRS rebuild, and the mature boards arrive in Year Two and beyond, and accept a deliberate bridge deficit while they do.

Through the acute phase the macro backstop is the Federal Reserve and the delivery backstop is Treasury—which is why this paper is also addressed to them. Retirement accounts reprice, and the Accord carries retirees on a floor that holds independent of the market: the Dignity Floor, universal healthcare, and a consumption base that no longer hinges on the market's level. Crossed this way, the disruption is a one-time repricing to a healthier equilibrium. Crossed badly—the gap left long and uncovered, collection forced into a falling market—it is the recession the critics will predict. The Accord does not have to choose between ambition and stability, but in the gap of 2028–2029 it has to use the instruments it actually holds.

References

Auerbach, A. J. (1979). Wealth maximization and the cost of capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(3), 433–446.

Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1–27.

Bernanke, B. S. (2005). The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit. Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists.

Brülhart, M., Gruber, J., Krapf, M., & Schmidheiny, K. (2022). Behavioral responses to wealth taxes: Evidence from Switzerland. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(4), 111–150.

DeLong, J. B., & Summers, L. H. (2012). Fiscal policy in a depressed economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2012, 233–297.

Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2004). Do the rich save more? Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 397–444.

Federal Reserve Board (2025). Financial Accounts of the United States (Z.1), Third Quarter 2025.

Jakobsen, K., Jakobsen, K., Kleven, H., & Zucman, G. (2020). Wealth taxation and wealth accumulation: Theory and evidence from Denmark. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 329–388.

Mian, A., Straub, L., & Sufi, A. (2021a). Indebted demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2243–2307.

Mian, A., Straub, L., & Sufi, A. (2021b). The Saving Glut of the Rich. NBER Working Paper No. 26941.

Mundell, R. A. (1963). Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29(4), 475–485.

Parker, J. A., Souleles, N. S., Johnson, D. S., & McClelland, R. (2013). Consumer spending and the economic stimulus payments of 2008. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2530–2553.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2014). Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries 1700–2010. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1255–1310.

Ramey, V. A. (2019). Ten years after the financial crisis: What have we learned from the renaissance in fiscal research? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 89–114.

Rose, A. K., & Yellen, J. L. (1989). Is there a J-curve? Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(1), 53–68.

Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). Progressive wealth taxation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2019, 437–533.

Summers, L. H. (2014). U.S. economic prospects: Secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound. Business Economics, 49(2), 65–73.

Asset-valuation data (Buffett Indicator, 2026 readings) compiled from Advisor Perspectives, Current Market Valuation, and Siblis Research market-cap-to-GDP trackers. NAA program parameters and rollout sequence drawn from the Accord category files and the rollout page.